Chicago Bulls: When ripping at the trade deadline makes sense (and doesn’t)


Franchises stumble out of the gate every NBA This leads to a cacophony of voices which makes the case the time has come to blow it up.


This reaction could be valid, or at least more valid than the team staying where it is. However, it is important to distinguish how and why these decisions must be made while also recognizing that true rip-offs actually occur less frequently for a variety of reasons.

This exercise will focus on Chicago Bulls, a playoff team from last season and currently sits 21-24 and 10th in the Eastern Conference. The concepts, however, apply to other situations.

Typically, there are two primary advantages to a sale of an NBA team: the assets they get from trading to outside shareholders and the improvement of their draft picks. There are other potential positives, such as allowing time to evaluate young players, and owners being able to appreciate the lower but better costs of drafting capital. What they gain in the trades are the main selling points from a team building perspective.

The bulls are a particularly interesting test case for the second selling point because of their current commitments. I usually analyze this component by asking, “How bad is the rest of the road?” But since Chicago owes its first-round pick to the Orlando Magic (unless they end up in the top four), a better question might be, “What would they gain in terms of renewal for this year if they were sold?” The Bulls are three games under . 500 with a negative score differential, below their expectations but still well ahead of the weakest teams in the league.

Beyond that, there is the matter of that protected choice. Thanks to the NBA’s lottery reforms, even the team with the worst record in the league has only a 52.1 percent chance of securing a top-four selection; which drops to 48.1 percent for the fourth worst record and sharpest after that.

Moreover, the Bulls trade enough players to go down there and then retain their pick weakens the roster enough that they’ll be more likely to send to Orlando a solid pick in 2024 when the pick is protected among the top three. (Note: If the Bulls keep a pick in both 2023 and 24, they instead trade second-round picks to the Magic; that’s a significant drop.)

The greatly reduced draft incentive is only part of the equation, though, and the flip side is great for the Bulls because they have three different players who have made All-Star teams in the past three seasons: DeMar DeRozanAnd Zack Lavigne And Nikola Vucevic.

• DeRozan’s situation is the most obvious. While the midrange maestro is already 33, he earned an All-NBA selection last season and made $28.6 million next season. But the question is how strong the draw is for him and not whether or not it is tradable. What keeps that apart from a really excellent return (think Jrue holidayAnd Rudy Goubert or Donovan Mitchell) is DeRozan’s age, though that might make him more interested in a contract extension to secure a contract before free agency in 2024.

DeRozan’s value also reflects well on Artūras Karnišovas, the Bulls decision-maker who has negotiated this team-friendly contract now by signing and trading in 2021. Karnišovas has had great production out of DeRozan and is likely to bring in a stronger return than that first two seconds he surrendered to the acquisition. DeRozan in the first place. Although all other decisions did not go well, betting on DeRozan was an unparalleled success for Karnicovas and the bull.

• LaVine is a much more difficult concept for several main reasons. First, unlike DeRozan and Vučević, the 27-year-old LaVine could be young enough to be part of the Bulls’ powerful teams even after the theoretical 2023 deadline sells out, making keeping him a reasonable option.

Zack Lavigne (Kamil Krzaczynski / USA Today)

The second, and bigger question mark, is Lavigne’s left knee. An All-Star in his twenties usually generates great interest in the commercial market, but LaVine suffered a knee injury last season before he had surgery after the playoffs. Those knee issues didn’t end in action, and LaVine has wasted some time this season and started well below par in his last two All-Star campaigns with dips in free throws pulled and finished around the basket, which could be indicators of decreased athleticism. But, LaVine has looked a lot better over the past month or so in terms of sports and production, and it has at least mitigated but may not have eliminated those early season concerns.

Given that the Bulls and LaVine agreed to a five-year, $215.6 million contract last season, some potential suitors may be a little risk-averse, though I’m sure plenty of front offices would still roll those dice if the opportunity presented itself. The main question that Karnishovas, the front office, and the medical staff will have to answer is whether they can expect LaVine to recover sufficiently and reliably enough to drive the next great Chicago team. If not, it’s better to take some whites to their faces now than to deal with a more serious situation later. The other big question: Given that LaVine is 27 years old, is it reasonably possible to sell and completely rebuild before the end of his term?

• Vučević offers various other negotiations due to the expiration of his contract. If Karnišovas decides to do a teardown, Vučević should be a part of it, but the Bulls can let his contract expire if performances are poor, which is unlikely. Although attack-first positions aren’t for everyone, there are enough general managers who appreciate how an effective senior can reliably give way and open up their offense. And Vučević’s lack of a long-term contract combined with bird rights would work better for some suitors than a locked-in, multi-year commitment.

What makes the Bulls’ deadline decision even more difficult is that all of these individual negotiations affect each other in a variety of ways. After all, transferring one of those three players while keeping the other two weakens the Bulls for the season but not enough to make them likely to keep their pick. He presumably makes sense to either sell hard or keep them together, with the possible exception of Vučević depending on the offers.

Another notable wrinkle is that salary-matching collective bargaining agreement rules give the bulls some latitude for latitude as deals involving the three biggest names can involve players earning 25 percent more or less than their outgoing stars’ salaries — which is $5.5 million for Vucevic and more. DeRozan and Lavigne. That means Karnishovas could be paid in one deal for a stronger return and forgo the salary in another if the ownership wants to stay under the luxury tax for the season.

The Bulls have far more players in limbo than just their Big Three names. Alex Caruso It was another victory for Karnicovas and he could generate some assets either in his own deal or as a sweetener in a bigger deal, especially since he’s under $10 million contract through the 2024-25 season. It will be difficult to move Lonzo Ball Given his health issues but it seems every other Bulls player could at least be up for discussion Derek Jones Jr It could veto the trade because it would wipe out his bird rights thanks to a nuance in the collective bargaining agreement.

Along these lines, the main assessment of the front office is, if they are going to change the schedule to compete, when will they prioritize? The team led by LaVine will need to get back into contention in the final game faster than the team he is banking on Patrick Williams And the players have not yet been drafted, and this changes the approach to Caruso’s negotiations on Deadline and Ayo Dosonmu This summer when he landed in restricted free agency. Franchisees don’t need to put all their eggs in one basket on this front, but a clear vision makes success more likely.

What can i do?

I often use the term “defining success” because there are completely different priorities that affect team building that can often vary across franchises.

Everyone wants to win a title every year, but very few franchises can be in this rarefied atmosphere at the same time, and even fewer can stay there for years on end. Normally this would be a ownership-wide decision given they sign checks, but if I’m running the show, the main threshold is whether the group has a credible shot at winning multiple playoff series in the same postseason. Others can appreciate a consistent playoff team without a real tournament improvement, but that’s not my personal preference; I don’t appreciate making the playoffs without a solid chance even in the conference finals.

Although injuries can reward the field somewhat, my reading says there will be enough teams in the Eastern Conference with a higher level of talent than these Bulls. Chicago is unlikely to be knocked out in the first round with below-average health likely to make it a fight for the Play-In Championship.

Under normal circumstances with this rating, I’d work hard to find a new home for DeRozan and Vučević while listening to LaVine, but the protected draft pick adds an element that makes immediate selling less appetizing. Instead, the question becomes whether I can get more for DeRozan and Vučević now than in June/July. This answer is very likely, yes, but it’s less compelling without the incentive of the draft. My instinct is that business partners would prefer DeRozan to have two installments of playoffs and also have a window to negotiate an extension, and promote deadline bids compared to the offseason program.

In mid-December, trading LaVine also seemed like a more obvious play given his early struggles, but the past month has been really encouraging and has gotten me exponentially excited about keeping him. But I will listen to the offers because $215.2 million over five years is a massive commitment, and I have real concerns that there will be enough time to overhaul the roster to make it competitive during the LaVine Gala. Holding on to LaVine at this deadline makes sense even if the intention is to transfer him eventually because a strong second half allows the Bulls to assess the fit with their remaining players and convince other general managers that LaVine’s knee problems are in the past.

Finally, the looming prospect of a big national television deal (and eventual increase in the salary cap) starting in the 2025-26 season will motivate me to get my duck in a row early, which means leveling out the roster and ideally getting the small core or on At least get close when the scene changes. If the Bulls figure it out before other front offices, there could be some huge opportunities a few years from now.

(Top photo by Demar DeRozan and Nikola Vuzevic: Dale Zanin/USA Today)

s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,

fbq(‘dataProcessingOptions’, []);
fbq(‘init’, ‘207679059578897’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);

%d bloggers like this: